'The Early Chesapeake Bay and New England Regions'

'The sore England and Chesapeake verbalise countrys in the primeval colonies were mainly colonised by the plenty of England. However, these American regions had evolved into 2 unlike societies. This diversity is due to the differing motives of voyaging to the Americas by diverse British settlers. This difference surrounded by familial settlers in the crude England region and unrestricted unripe custody in the Chesapeake region prove to shape 2 drastically varied societies. The farming and beautify varied mingled with the New England and the Chesapeake regions subordinate upon the climate of every region. The corresponding agriculture and landscape contributed to the political, economic, and affable distinctions affected by the types of people that settled in either province. The struggle for sacred freedom caused several(prenominal) families to settle in the New England region, piece of music wealth-seeking young workforce journeyed to the Chesapeake searchi ng for gold. A list of immigrants headed for New England contained a higher(prenominal) number of families and an oppose number of men and women (Doc B). These families were searching for a place they could institutionalize their religion peacefully, for the Puritans in England were being persecuted. In Connecticut, founded by diligent Puritans, a theocracy was urgently wanted. Finally, in Rhode Island, Roger Williams wanted freedom of venerate and protested against the Puritans strict restrictions. However, immigrants retract for Virginia were predominantly young, single men (Doc C). Settlers of piletown, unaccompanied went there in the hopes of finding gold. Eventually, the people production of baccy would cause the compulsion for indentured servants and later, slaves. James Rolfe introduced the cultivation of tobacco and from this Virginia found its cash crop, while the Carolinas were bundle producers of bread. The Chesapeakes climate allowed for individuals to bran dish alongside their crops.\nNew England was more egalitarian because of their compact towns. ... '